tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2956830097495837473.post5021946701738030035..comments2023-10-14T13:18:37.330+01:00Comments on angels in marble: The Member for Eastleighhatfield girlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12673905475452420002noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2956830097495837473.post-40998024625319013362012-02-07T13:59:54.105+00:002012-02-07T13:59:54.105+00:00I imagine, Bo, you would have to sign-up that you ...I imagine, Bo, you would have to sign-up that you were driving - otherwise we could all just say 'X was driving' and get away with it, without any of the trikki business of involving others in our bad behaviour.<br /><br />The first form is just part and parcel of agreeing to misbehave.<br /><br />The affidavit is another matter. That affidavit was part and parcel of correcting a wrong act she had undertaken, for whatever reasons, earlier.hatfield girlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12673905475452420002noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2956830097495837473.post-19852406147092249862012-02-06T22:47:39.941+00:002012-02-06T22:47:39.941+00:00I wonder if it's Pryce who is in trouble
- she...I wonder if it's Pryce who is in trouble<br />- she has signed a form saying she was driving<br />- she seems to have signed an affidavit saying she wasn't <br /><br />it's pretty indisputable that one or other of those statements was an attempt to pervert the course of justice.<br /><br />On the other hand Huhne may well be safe. To convict him a jury needs to be sure he was driving. Pryce's evidence can hardly be relied on. Absent that he might get off.<br /><br />Pryce might call alibi evidence to show that it wasn't her driving. But perhaps Huhne thinks he can do the same.. It's going to be fun watchingBotogolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17024057489361848870noreply@blogger.com