Thousands of homes suffering power cuts yesterday in south-east London, from half past seven in the morning, as EDF Energy said supplies were isolated 'for safety reasons'- "We are liaising closely with the fire service and apologise for the inconvenience this is causing customers,"- is very bad news.
'Inconvenience' is a wholly inadequate way to describe the problems generated within a modern domestic environment in a first world metropolis by a power failure. Must we recast our lives completely, including our physical environment, to meet the demands of a world where power, food, transport, warmth, water, and shelter are no longer guaranteed?
Those who stocked up on a year's worth of basics last summer have already profited from their foresight and their storage space. But that is the simplest response to give and within the decision-taking aegis of individuals; all it needs is cash, a freezer, a larder and a car (any one of which of which can be in short supply in many city homes).
Private transport is under attack when the private transport of goods as well as family members is becoming an essential for many, particularly women. Heating bills threaten to rise further by up to 40%; we have some private response to this - clothing, 'living cold', and if we are rich enough insulating our dwelling.
Water other than for drinking and cooking is not a private decision-taking area, more a public health disaster threat (cutting off water for non-payment in some high rise blocks in Birmingham was rethought hurriedly at the end of the last century). Others have commented widely on threats to our private control over shelter. Power is outside our private control completely. It cannot be stored and its guaranteed supply cannot be bought by individuals. Indeed they are the first in line for cuts when supply shortages erupt. The graduated loss of private control over essentials of life is total with electricity.
Metropolitan, city, town, even rural life styles are built on long standing assurance of uninterrupted power. Apologies for 'inconvenience' are a measure of the dislocation between what we have built our private lives on, and what we face now.
Monday, 9 June 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
You sound very anxious, HG.
I'm not saying you're wrong but I hope you're alright.
Hello E-K, it is kind to feel concern. Personally, coping is well underway.
But electricity cuts in London in the 21st century are symptomatic of fragility in essential systems for mass life styles.
We are being driven by actions and inaction ranging from failure to provide back-ups to major surveillance and enforcement into a lower, less satisfactory standard of living, not just what we might have had with greater individual control over expenditures and choice, but what was actually available to a bigger part of the population in my parents' time.
If what comes over is anxiety then I'm saying it wrong. What I feel is disillusionment. Being poor is bad enough but being rendered poor unnecessarily -and suffering power cuts, standing in queues for health care, running a maze to get an ordinary education, standard travel so expensive or such an obstacle course - or both... is a rip off.
The 'there's a war on' cheerfulness and putting up with things is an attitude being elicited in the constant propaganda talked about globalisation, climate change, etc.
I'm all right but not happy about the world of opportunity lost in the last decade, and by Labour, of all parties.
I'm ... not happy about the world of opportunity lost in the last decade, and by Labour, of all parties.
What's this "of all parties", thing?
Labour is the party of lost - or denied - opportunities. It goes with the territory of socialism.
You seem to have noticed what's going on (excessive state meddling in every possible area of life), without realising that it's an inevitable consequence of thinking that the state is the solution - when in fact it's the state that is the problem.
Keep noticing, keep thinking, you'll work it out!
Post a Comment