Saturday, 15 May 2010

Welcome to the Sunlit Uplands

It took the whole electorate but  we separated the government of the country from self-identification with the state.  Government has returned to being powerful but not permanent.  We even have a Department of Education again.  And although a particular theory of history as being the product of interacting and impersonal forces rather than the actions of individuals has suffered a blow, we are rid of some remarkably pernicious individuals' influences on our fortunes.  Our objective economic circumstances have not changed but the people dealing with them at government level are competent and, crucially, willing to be advised by the pragmatic and technically skilled.


Various assaults on our claims to pass through our lives privately, pursuing our idiosyncratic interests, are being abandoned and dismantled.  Our data will not be wiped from the half-completed state and 'lost'  data bases, but at least there is an end to any further collection, and what are held are held sufficiently incompetently for there to be a real expectation of the whole shebang falling into disuse.


The Commons has been offered a lifting of one of the greatest powers over its whipped membership - the threat of forcing every member to face re-election unless they do as the Executive tell them to do - and while they are having a passing difficulty in understanding this they will get the idea eventually.


We are to have an elected second  chamber.  Angels would like to see the entire current Lords required to stand for election, alongside any new candidates but, short of that, the withering away of the placemen and troughing party hacks will have to do; at least a start will have been made.  Perhaps the current House of Lords could be bodily removed to a purpose-built heritage museum and the elected Senate installed in Westminster.


The bringing into use of all the machinery of devolved government, particularly between Scotland's parliament and the federal Westminster parliament left even Alex Salmond looking gob-smacked.  Ending the use of Scotland as a Labour party Westminster support system will be immensely beneficial in both countries, and for the United Kingdom as a whole.  Damaging to the Labour party, certainly, but do we care?


Best of all, the progressive alliance that we all knew existed in our country has turned out to be a centre right progressive alliance -   our old, dear friend One Nation Conservatism survived and has been found thriving,  welcomed back by over 60% of us.  The Labour party's renewal will be welcome too, and interesting, once the brace of Milibands and the lowering threat of unenlightened trade unionism has been seen off.  Some of Angels' best friends are social democrats and there are many examples of egalitarian and socially inclusive governance the electorate may prefer when it is able to be offered by a reformed and democratised Labour party.


Normal service has been resumed.

4 comments:

Elby the Beserk said...

It seems to me that the first task of the new government is to answer at last the West Lothian question, by sending the Scottish MPs packing. They have their own parliament - why must they interfere in ours?

Scotland seems to be so stupid that it actually prefers Socialism, prefers its ruling elite to live high on their hog whilst communities such as Martin's constituency get NO benefit from Labour's rule. So let Scotland become a Socialist paradise, and we'll stick to what suits us down here.

hatfield girl said...

Right to the heart of the problem as usual, Elby. The Scottish conundrum. A country so abused by Labour it can't think straight. If I were Scottish I would resent that Scotland was bought so cheap as the Labour client base. I would resent the ignoring by Labour of the minimal devolution and its institutions that has been achieved. I would resent the resentment the treatment of Scotland has caused in England when actually it is the Labour party who has been using divide and rule tactics.

On top of all that there is the problem of the nature of the Scottish Labour party which displays all the characteristics of a pseudo political but really subversive and exploitative organisation associated with a stranglehold over a client base in a poor but culturally highly differentiated area of a state; same thing with the Mafia for the Sicilians or Cosa Nostra for the Neapolitans.

A very nasty thing Scottish Labour. Quite as nasty as the mafiosi.

Sackerson said...

But when the Euro dream collpases we may want the Union.

hatfield girl said...

The Union should be nourished within or without Europe shouldn't it S?

What needs addressing is the Scottish Labour party, its policies and practices. Neither Labour, specifically, nor the United Kingdom, more generally, can have such an organisation playing any role in our politics. Labour needs to hold a very public inquiry into Scottish Labour and the leadership election should address this requirement.

No democratic, pluralist and UK-wide social democratic party can have something like Scottish Labour involved with it. It's unsafe for the rest of the country, as the defeated regime has shown.