Friday, 20 April 2007

Devolution and deviousness

Devolution is the word used by government to describe the regionalisation of the United Kingdom. It brings to mind the separate parliament of Scotland and the Assemblies of Wales and Northern Ireland. But there are 12 devolved parts of the UK and it is illuminating to think of 12 United Kingdom regions, each with a regional assembly, of which 4 are elected by proportional representation - Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, and London. The other 8 regional assemblies are appointed by central government from a mixture of elected representatives of lower level local authority bodies, community stakeholders (religious, local business, cultural groupings, state-funded various) and rag, tag and bobtail others.

These regions are the product of European Union statistical entities created for the purposes of collecting the data etc., needed for European Union allocations both of statuses and resources. In England the majority have no responsiveness to geographical, historical, economic, social or cultural links. They are a grid.

The largest is the South East followed, in order of size, by: London, the North West, the East, the West Midlands, Scotland, Yorkshire and the Humber, the South West, the East Midlands, Wales, the North East; the last is Northern Ireland which is such a special case it is not part of this post.

The appointed regional assemblies in England have yielded an enormous bonus to central government in terms of party control. Budgets for these assemblies run into billions of pounds of tax revenue returned to the UK by the European Union. We are funding a government administration countrywide network of jobs, investment, cultural allocations, environmental spending and a host of other forms of patronage. The regional assemblies drain power from directly elected local authorities, money is directed to them and diverted from other local authorities, and they have direct connection with the European Union’s Europe of the Regions.

Such an executive power base is not going to be left to any other governing party should there be a general election. Before leaving office the Labour government will activate electoral procedures for the English assemblies under proportional representation, as already exists for London, the only elected English assembly. This will have the advantage of wiping out the importance of widespread losses in the May local elections, and make the case for election by proportional representation to the Westminster parliament immensely strong. The heterogeneous nature of these regions does not aid any conservative, large or small "c", bid. And should there be a Conservative administration in Westminster, it will face elected power in some regions that are bigger than Scotland.

7 comments:

Newmania said...

HG are you a lecturer in Political Science or something of the sort ? Your last paragraph is not possible is it following rejection by Newcastle and I though the project was quietly being dropped ? I am far from clear in fact what powers are retained and what precisely was the effect of all this has been
Huusing or rather the concreting over of the SE has been actioned through the regional authorities .

How I wish you were joining myself and Croydonian in a semi regular attempt to put the world to rights this evening .Have you read the Lyons report ? I keep meaning to have a look



"make the case for election by proportional representation to the Westminster parliament immensely strong "

How so ? They are already hated I`d have thought the reverse.
HG the thing I fear above all is PR it would be the end of democracy as understood in the country

What do we do ? I have said before , and I mean it , that if they do that I am making my protest a bit more up close and personal.

Another triumph

hatfield girl said...

I'm not an academic N, but they're changing the rules and it's not being talked about. I thought to set it all out as we talk about it like you do with Mr C.
pr and Balls and his treasury henchman's Plan B for the regions is next, at the weekend.

Newmania said...

but they're changing the rules and it's not being talked about.


That sums it up .I wish HG you were not such a newbie to this .Your thoughts deserve more attention but that takes time . I have at least told Dale that he should have alook .Perhaps we can get you on Doughty Street

hatfield girl said...

N, Raedwald is the person who says it well, briefly, and accurately. I wish I had written some of his posts. What is written up here is more about inevitable results of longterm changes. R's 'Let's get on with it' post for an English parliament would be an opener to much of what needs talking about; Iain Dale has supported separate parliaments before. Perhaps a programme on that would show the the problems.

hatfield girl said...

He should get the Earl of Onslow too; there's a man who asks the right questions and knows what is being lost.

Newmania said...

I am a great fan of Raedders as well HG amd of your good self.

hatfield girl said...

Thank you, N. Perhaps it was playing in Hatfield Park as a child, and really approving of the House (very jolly gardens too)but I seem to have a weakness for hereditary peers and their views. I always liked Lord Balniel too, the sheer shininess and sleekness of his hair, like in films, and the chiselled jaw , against the lovely deep blue background with 'Vote Balniel' in big white letters. Now there was an MP to be represented by, even if I was only a child. See, first past the post is realer than any kind of PR ; I couldn't even name my MP in Florence, nor the party either; Frank Dobson can instantly be brought to mind (pity about the hair) and is also a decent and interesting man. And that hang dog look of Robert Rhodes James is unforgettable as he stood at the door gloomily asking for my support.