The group of large and small islands off the western coast of Europe have no name that is agreed among them all. Each island and each nation state has reasons from the history that binds them, despite their geo-political commonality, to reject any name - not the British Isles (the most beautiful ), because the Republic of Ireland, which calls itself Ireland, objects; not Great Britain, because it excludes the Union with six of the counties of ancient Ulster; not the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland because it excludes the the Bailiwick of Jersey, the Bailiwick of Guernsey (including Alderney, Herm, and Sark), and the Isle of Man.
What should we call ourselves? We belong together, we need to recognize our alliance just as much as we need to recognize our sovereignties. And the sovereignty that Westminster has exercised over Scotland is ending, just as it did in the Republic of Ireland (but please God without the violence), just as Scottish interference in Westminster , and essentially English concerns, must end too. Westminster's role in Archipelago politics has ended as surely as did Westminster's role in Asia, in Africa and in the old Commonwealth countries.
'Ever since the break up of the Roman empire one of the constant facts of political life in Europe has been the emergence of independent nations. They have come into existence over the centuries in different forms, different kinds of government, but all have been inspired by a deep, keen feeling of nationalism, which has grown as the nations have grown.
In the twentieth century, and especially since the end of the war, the processes which gave birth to the nation states of Europe have been repeated all over the world. We have seen the awakening of national consciousness in peoples who have for centuries lived in dependence upon some other power. ' As ever, Harold Macmillan speaks as he eats: 'The wind of change is blowing through this continent [or Archipelago], and whether we like it or not, this growth of national consciousness is a political fact. We must all accept it as a fact, and our national policies must take account of it.'
The European Union has not ended national, and more local, conciousness, despite the bitter complaints of those who regret that the second War did not yield to the victor the spoils. Within its federalist co-operation, smaller nations and smaller regional and princely states, subsumed in the late nineteenth century into greater powers, are thriving again without destroying geo-political links with their own interests to pursue.
We must achieve the same, become not the 'Penisola' that calls itself Italy but is Tuscany, Lombardy, the Veneto...but become the Archipelago of the Western European Isles, with each nation ruling itself, and each and every interest at the federated Archipelago level - towards the Atlantic alliance, towards the Commonwealth, and towards the benefits of co-operation with Europe - more acceptably balanced.
To do that the 'constitutional conversation' that has been set off in Scotland (as have so many other great movements within our Archipelago) must be extended to each and every one of our islands, the largest and the smallest, and a truly new politics must be forged.
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
Albion?
We're in need of rethinking completely our relations with one another before we find our new relations with Europe and with our Commonwealth of Nations, Scrobs.
Where is the political leader with the charisma and the brains, and the regard that will be essential to avoid the kind of strife - violent or not - and the unsatisfactory solutions, that are offered by the current crop?
And it is strange that our head of state never says anything to us; discretion is one thing - but total silence? For decades? Because all of these reformations of our parties and our politics have been there for longer than the last horrific decade. Much of what has gone so wrong is because new Labour chose to try a last imperial fling, and now the British army is surrounded in southern Iraq with little chance of getting out with its equipment nd its armour. While the European Union forges its institutional future without the slightest reference to the needs of the Archipelago as a whole, or its wider atlantic and commonwealth relations.
We could not be more ill-served than by a party calling itself Labour (though I do not recognise it any more), led by an unelected numpty.
I would say Ireland has more in common with Poland than with the mainland HG ..Catholic sod busters and so on. Its interesting if you look at Europe from a non UK centric point of view. Scandinavia somehow look larger and more important than one expects.
Glad to see you back i thought perhaops you had gone into higing .
OOOO guess what I`m going to be in the top thirty bloggers thing ..I recommended you myself
You are kind, N. When this blog started at Easter you were not pleased with some things said here, no more you are now, I expect, but you wrote' I'm determined to like you" ! And kept looking.
Poland may be catholic but there is a very different kind of catholicism there - with a nasty radio maria streak.
Ireland speaks and writes some of the best English ever, and they can dig a trench, which is harder than might be thought.
We can't be closer to Scandinavians than to the people in the archipelago. The Scandinavians have quite different sets of external relations whereas we have the US, the Commonwealth, and the EU (well some of the member states, others are a bit remote; Rumania never felt neighbourly, or Lithuania etc.).
When is the top 30 coming out so I can admire Newmania and say 'he reads Angels?'
Is Ales Salmond the Dom Mintoff of the North?
,....Well when I say top thirty actually there is a blog directory coming out Dale is always trailing it. I think he chose people more or less at random to feature...and mostly if you come high on his visits . I come very high indeed . So not a mark of popularity and certainly not quality...but the doh ray me me me me me is satisfied nonetheless .
I am always pleased with you HG and when I can understand you I am pleased with myself . Win win.
XX
Mr Salmond is the mirror image of Mintoff isn't he? A social democrat, not old Labour; a european unionist , seeking separation from the UK, not wholesale integration.... a party man but essentially a conciliator and a politician highly aware of the geological strata underlying party positions and agendas.
Perhaps he could be thought of as the Prodi of the North, S?
The inept and ill-considered constitutional changes over the past 10 years were thrust upon an unsuspecting population by a very tiny minority of determined Scottish politicians who have dominated the UK Parliament to push through their own particular and narrow agenda. These changes were neither sought nor especially welcomed by the vast majority of the inhabitants of these islands, including a majority of the residents of Scotland and/or Wales. Thus under different circumstances much of the resulting damage to the unity of the UK might be able to be rectified, or at least modified, in the future to take account of the desires of the majorities in each of the countries that make up the UK. If the majority of Scots really want full Independence, let them have it. But they will then have to stand on their own two feet without "development aid" from the rest of the country or the Treasury. None of the Dependencies is clamouring for Independence, or full integration, and seem happy with the way things are.
From an overseas viewpoint, the group of islands off the coast of Europe is known throughout the world as the British Isles, ignoring Irish objections, and will continue to be known as such. The UKGB&NR mouthful is only used in official inter-Governmental documents and can safely be ignored for most other purposes. In other words - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Tampering with the status quo will raise - unnecessarily - a whole hornets' nest of probably insoluble problems.
Of course, if certain people had their way the whole caboodle would simply be known as the 51st State and be called something like South West America!
Perhaps a faux Euro-unionist, paying both sides to wangle more for his own? Hence the Mintoff analogy. Or maybe like QE1 vs France and Spain.
Surely Scots wouldn't really want to be some even tinier county within Europia - "Scotlandshire". Or are you, too, enamoured of the European project?
'..Tampering with the status quo will raise - unnecessarily - a whole hornets' nest of probably insoluble problems.'
As you remark, Nomad, the tampering was begun a decade ago and is both unacceptable to the majorities in all the countries concerned, and now irredeemable because the nationalists have taken their chances superbly; all this mess driven through by a tiny power elite who are running a veiled agenda.
Sacks, I'm not a great fan of the EU, particularly as there is a viable scenario for the UK which would have been fine - a friendly and formally signed up association with the EU yet equally formally distanced so that independent financial, economic, foreign and domestic policies were retained; there are model states in just this relation; that window was deliberately closed by New 'Labour' when the constituent countries of the UK were devolved.
The New 'Labour' junta have a wholly EU integrationist policy for the UK, and they're there, they've done it, but they themselves are coming apart and leaving the appalling consequences. Same difference in Iraq.
We should join Canada and be called the Trans-Maritime Provinces.
Bit of a role reversal though D-M, being provinces of somewhere, well a former Dominion actually. But I suppose it's better than being the Trans Manche Provinces of the EU.
Post a Comment