Friday, 12 October 2007

Northern Who?

Why is Northern Rock being treated so well? Had it collapsed under the weight of its directors' business plan that would have been unfortunate for depositors and shareholders but hardly more than a mildly embarrassing pimple on the financial face of the UK. Their mortgage book is sub prime all on its own - look at the offer only days ago to an undercover reporter of a 125% mortgage at a multiple of six times his salary - if their mortgages are all like that there is little to do with the US sub prime market causing their problems.

Yet the one- offness of their improvidence was obscured under a lot of flim flam about exposure to world problems and linkage pulling in other (unnamed) financial institutions and the need to act; while the Bank of England saw no need to act at all, not for that 'bank' anyway.

Still the Labour regime warped the entire policy of the 'independent' Bank of England and displayed the inadequacy of the FSA's monitoring function to prevent a small provincial bank going to the wall.

So who are Northern Rock, to be defended by Labour with such intransigence ? Why did our guest who had returned to remove life savings and inheritance from a deposit account, not unnaturally more than flustered by the queues and the worry, on meeting a banking neighbour get told: 'They'd never let NR go down, no need to have come back at all'. The mind turns to the geographical identity of Northern Rock's home ground .

During the last miners' strike Northern Rock is said to have assured miners not to worry about their mortgages and payments; there is an identity of 'mission statement' from the Northern Rock Foundation (which benefits from a large subvention annually from NR as well as its initial endowment on demutualisation), and the National Union of Miners commitment to defend the interests of miners, their extended families (and seeing as there are hardly any miners now that's quite an outreach over more than a generation), and their 'communities' (surely those have dissolved quarter of a century after the industry collapsed?).

'The Treasury has been ambiguous about how long its guarantee supporting Northern Rock is for ' , says the Telegraph, as profit- taking on share volatility continues. The depositors have got their savings out with the help, as of yesterday, of £ 13 billion of government loans (and we will be last in the creditors' queue, the money is gone, and yes, they can print it but that doesn't help the inflation spread across us all); why were preference shareholders not given their 3 weeks notice so that their dividend was delayed as it could have been - they have trousered their £40 million. What is tax-payers' money being used to prop up exactly, in Labour's heartland?

"the government has become complicit in large-scale and irresponsible lending by the same management, even today, in what amounts to little short of a banking scam," said Vincent Cable, the Liberal Democrat Economic spokesperson. “Are you aware that the same lending practices are continuing today?” Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay, a member of his Treasury team, had rung Northern Rock the day before, reports the Times, to ask about a mortgage. “The terms were quite extraordinary. He was offered 127 per cent of the value of the house, including a roll-up of the arrangement fee, and five to six times his income,” noted Vince, adding, “30 per cent of the loan was going to be unsecured”.

Over 1% of GDP taken up in less than a month and more available . Who are these people?

Continued:

On Wednesday, the Northern Rock Charitable Foundation appointed Europa Partners, the independent corporate finance house, as adviser.

The foundation gets 5 per cent of the bank’s pre-tax profits. ‘It will receive a stake of just below 15 per cent of the fully diluted equity capital should the bank be sold.’ reports the FT.

'... the Northern Rock Foundation warned against a transaction conducted on “unfavourable terms, simply to meet a self-imposed timetable”. It plans to lobby other investors to ensure any offer is fair.’

The charity, created when Northern Rock demutualised in 1997 , the year of the New Dawn, has received £192m so far and disbursed £156m. Its activities are focused solely on Northern Rock’s heartland, north-east England .

‘Its spending over the decade has, Northern Rock believes, made it the UK’s biggest corporate donor and more than half the region’s voluntary bodies have received support from it.'

They offer a £60, 000 annual North East Writer's Prize, (amongst a veritable sea of grants for those who can cram themselves into Kinnock's famous categories of what not to be) , only you'd have to live there. Thought not.

Why don't we own Northern Rock? After all, we've paid over £13 billion so far and nobody but the Leader and his Treasury value it at much more than half a billion pounds.

14 comments:

Sackerson said...

HG: Your argument is scandalous and, I suspect, justified. How sick-making.

lilith said...

This is criminal. Why are the FSA allowing these lending practices? Why is the taxpayer helping these people out? Just HOW many people have photos of Gordon Brown in a nappy on a rocking horse?

Raedwald said...

Yes, excellent perception HG. Something stinks here. Much more to come, I suspect.

hatfield girl said...

International economisty/financy/regulation of global economic behavioury people were giggling into their dinners last week end about a couple of centuries of reputation for the UK financial system being trashed for this ex building society.
Busting open the tripartite regulatory system and setting them at each others throats for what? Mass loathe-in of the Governor of the (independent ho, ho) Bank of England? No-one put in to supervise? £13 billion?

hatfield girl said...

L, that's what I can't get a grip on. The problems with subprime lending and packaging up in bits with decent stuff - yes, that I get.
But who is supposed to be supervising lending practices of banks in England to whom depositers have lent in good faith, believing there is a regulatory system for lending in place? And if it is the FSA why were the directors of this manky bank and their manky business plan not checked? And are there others? Honestly I thought my poor guest was going to lose it after I casually translated the headlines over breakfast and it dawned on us slowly what Northern Rock was, and it appears is, up to.

Newmania said...

I have been reading that the whole gearing of lending was uniquely from markets and not from deposits makinng them especially vulnerable.

Does the bonus scheme cast any luight on this high risk strategy . It was 5%of basic for every 1% of growth of profit before tax up to 100%. Do you think its possible that personal greed played any part in the strategy they had .

I have the figures on the strange set up at Northern Rock and i `ll look them up.

HG your commnet on the Virus thread on Dale was one of the best I have ever seen.

We are not worthy

Newmania said...

Here we are:

Northern Rock got into trouble because it broke the golden rule of banking : It lent long and borrowed short. It lent mortgages and went to short terms money markets to get its funding . For every £1 deposited it was lending a whopping £3.20. Compare that with others HSBC £0.97 Lloyds TSB£1.35. The next largest ratio is Standard Life at v£240 but the average across a pool of the 15 largest lenders is 1£1.11. The markets were soon onto this and Alliance and Leicester’s shares took an immediate hit as their ratio was out at £1.57 .

It is quite clear that the a bail out can only have the most damaging morla hazard effects and in effect we have all contributed directly into Brown’s campaign fund . Why was it that Northern rock came to the conclusion they were so much cleverer than everyone else.

It rather reminds me if the endless money lost by Enver Hodge for Islington by investing receipts in silly and chancy ways or the rather odd deal Living stone was doing with Chavez. I get the impression that Northern rock though of themselves as social entrepreneurs and despised the world in which they lived . Naturally they knew better than dull bankers and would show this by leading them a merry dance . Just a suggestion , as we have seen personal nets were feathered as well. It all stinks of socialism to me . Corruption arrogance and ignorance seem to have been the culprits and this post rightly shows how they have used sub prime to hide their failings .

Curiouser and curiouser HG

( Took me a while to find it as I file under S for sleaze and E for economy….decisions decisions …)

Newmania said...

Actually HG that really is staggering ... Thuink of the ciontext . brown borrows £4 billion and the pares even the Indipendent are astonished . the £30 billion off balance sheet borrowing is the subject of contanrt wrangling and i think the real shown debt is something like £
£30 billion. the whoe spend for next year is in the order £650 billion and the the welfare /socila payments about 394 billion


This is a truly staggering figure .I There must be something to this I don`t understand

Newmania said...

Finally ...whats the betting that "Southern " Rock would have been left to sink

hatfield girl said...

Barings might be thought of as Southern Rock, N. The arrogance of social entrepreneurs ignoring the parameters of the real world is legend, but in Northern Rock we have the Labour Leader holding off the otherwise inevitable at the most enormous cost in UK financial and dealing reputation, in sustaining banking and financial regulation, and £13 billion and rising arbitrarily allocated to a tiny group of to say the least reckless operators.

lilith said...

HG my ex brother in law works for RAB Capital, the Hedge fund that has bought x% of Northern Rock. I will try and find out what is happening. He hasn't replied to my flippant email about bailing out the taxpayer.

lilith said...

Guess what! Alistair Darling's mortgage is with Northern Rock!!!

http://business.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1628722007

hatfield girl said...

It looks as if running a demutualised building society has more clout than being Governor of the Bank of England, L.

Prodicus said...

Couple of musings.

What exactly is Branson proposing to buy... and why?

Is the government's action in the NR matter legit under EU law? Perhaps yes because NR is paying over the rate for the rescue facilities. Well, on paper, at least.