Wednesday 15 July 2009

Waste and Inequality

Having collected the letters in the village, Mr HG found a small group standing outside the building as he rounded the corner on his way to the butchers. "I'm a pupil of yours," said a smiling man, "So you may remember me. And then we stayed here once, on our way through Italy, and you took us in when it was just as hot as this."

"And you must come in out of the heat now," re-opening the main door and beaming across decades. The next day they came for lunch, driving over from Cortona with the family, where they were staying in the collapsing ruin a daughter had persuaded her father to buy. The ecohouse was looking at its best, blistering glare across the fields outside, layers of insulation and shadowed porticoes keeping us cool and grateful not to be outside rubbing our wingcases against our legs or whatever it is that makes that constant background noise from the woods and olive groves. They took heart; the ruin would transform. The amounts of hard work both on the ruin, and elsewhwere to scrape together the cost, would end in lunch with friends and all the gossip of how the years had gone.

The eldest son a film maker, which was a surprise. The friend explained that his application had been refused - excellent interview, unbeatable results, appropriate languages and post degree plans, but 'No'. Afterwards there had been great disappointment until after our friend had been telephoned by one of the interviewers.

He was very sorry. There was no way they could have accepted him. He was a candidate of just the sort that was wanted, and who could exploit to the full all that was on offer; who could use the learning and skills given to him to the enormous advantage of those he wanted to work with, and for, afterwards. But he is our friend's son. And that ruled him out.

Our friend explained that they were not well to do, that the boy had studied in Greece and Spain, as well as in his home country before they had settled in England again for the two A-level years at Sixth Form College. He had command of all the languages he would need, including mandarin (not that it's called mandarin any more), and other Asian languages.

That wasn't the point.

But his grandfather, from whom our friend had been estranged for so long, would guarantee any fees and could not understand what the boy had done wrong.

Grandfather was a problem too, and his father before him. They did not dare, literally, to take the candidate and the flack that would hit them from all sides. Privileged access. Nods and winks. Old boys. Connexion. The place would go to someone unexceptionable to the new politics.

Someone less qualified, someone quite unable to use what had been commandeered on their behalf. Someone whose education could not have been less privileged than that of a boy attending local schools as his parents lived the hippy values and dreams that had caused their ejection from the world of responsibility and duty their family stood for. Our friend was not inconsolable as his father and been. But all of us were well aware of the waste of resources and possibilities in the name of some silly egalitarianism that had no relevance where the boy would have worked and served.

Some institutions of 'religion, learning and research' are not just parts of universities; they are international and intergenerational in their reach, they are alternative routes to understanding, and to resolving intransigencies and even wars. They are not closed, caste-like systems but are open to the best of those who can use their rare resources to the limit. And to treat them as if they should conform to job qualification providers is to destroy capacities of which few enough remain to the country as it is. We cannot wish to start each generation afresh, as if nothing of what has gone before has any value, surely? And we cannot be so unfair as to deny what has been earned fair and square, because of our relations.

5 comments:

Raedwald said...

Yes, this new 'fairness' is a cruel thing; when one moves away from a meritocracy to this ghastly social engineering experiment very few individuals gain, many more lose and our national 'stock' of potential future talent is impoverished.

It's a cliche, but cream will rise. It doesn't need the clumsy intervention of the State to assist it. All the socialists are doing is repressing real talent; neither Arthur Seldon nor Ralph Harris would have risen from dire poverty in London's east end to the realisation of their potentials under this government.

Shame on them all.

Anonymous said...

A sad story.

One of the tenets of Marxism is that people are treated not on their merits, but according to their class origins. Nowadays in the West, as you recount, such treatment is usually of the negative type - discrimination is applied to those who are perceived to have "advantages" - to the great detriment not of themselves only, but of society and nation as a whole. Such are the fruits of envy.

The young understand this very well. My wife's god-daughter, on applying to a good university in Scotland, was heard to comment thus: "I'll be marked down because I went to a good school, but on the other hand I'll gain because neither of my parents are graduates; I don't think Mum's nursing degree will count against me because she was older when she got it".

Nothing about her own considerable merits, you see; she knew that if anything they would count against her.

Fortunately the pluses outweighed the minuses and she is now doing well at Edinburgh.

But what a rotten way to treat people, and how much talent must be wasted in these spiteful ways.

hatfield girl said...

Kenneth Berrill's obituary sums up the very best of what has been lost by the vapid notion of 'fairness'.

If fairness is what is sought a preliminary study of Nicky Kaldor on the subject should be undertaken, just to instil a bit of order and some oomph into muddled thinking.

Apart from that R, although there is no longer an empire, there is a vast store of imperial administrative experience that has been discarded as not just of no worth, but positively bad. Some is bad, unjustifiable, equally there are cogent criticisms addressed to it by the civil servants, district officers, ICS men, and their indigenous co-workers.

This foolish correct attitude has led to the inability to run a booze-up in a brewery in our own country; and quite soon everyone will be dead who had run a district, a health provision service, an educational programme, a transport system, an irrigation project, a court system... elsewhere. And those who would do this for their countries are denied access to the institutions that still have some skill and understandings to impart.

Nick Drew said...

I understand that the Williams sisters' prowess in tennis came from Pa Williams

so they should be disqualified

Anonymous said...

I rather suspect that the loss of Seldon and Harris would be seen by the left as a feature, not a bug.