Committment to the United Kingdom by the Irish, Welsh, Scottish, and English could not be at a lower ebb. Every nation within the Union that has had the opportunity for democratic expression of their requirements in the present, and plans for their future, has voted for a separation of the United Kingdom governance into national Parliaments.
The English People have had no chance to speak directly through the ballot box, as have the other nations, but in the strangled inadequacy of recent elections to drained-of -power local authorities, the insistence on an English Parliament can be heard.
Not English regional bodies, de-humanised and detached as they are from long-determined regions of England, nor even English regional bodies that could be more appropriately carved from England's realm.
An English Parliament that stands for all of England, from its south western tip to the Scottish borders, from the North Sea to the Welsh Marches is right. There is nothing to prevent a more local representation of, say, Cornwall, or the Ridings of Yorkshire, should that be desired. An English Parliament suffers no threat from the expression of local ties, but is strengthened by the clarity with which real regions can express their aims, and sustained by providing a forum and the means by which those aims can be reconciled within England.
Formerly the Westminster parliament was the English parliament, governing northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland. With the last elections this has ceased to be so. The governing Party at Westminster is not the governing Party in northern Ireland or in Scotland (in the case of Wales it probably won't be very shortly, once the perfidious 'Democrats' of the Liberal Democrats pull themselves together.)
The factors that have caused the urgency and essential requirement for an English Parliament for England are: the effects of economic globalisation on the wealth producing sectors of the British Isles; the effects of membership of the European Union; the complete unresponsiveness of the head of state of the United Kingdom to all and any of the wrenching changes that have occurred in the last decade. From within there has been the constitutional wrecking and anti-democratic destruction, accompanied and facilitated by the skewed redistribution of England-generated wealth; from without the opportunities presented by accession to a larger federated Union that remedies many of the failures that have destroyed the lesser federation of the United Kingdom.
England should accept a Prime Minister and Executive exercising all the powers of the English state (but not those of northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland, whose people have chosen to confide their democratic authority to their own Parliaments) elected only by the English people, and answering only to an English Parliament.
Sunday, 3 June 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
I have come to this view but U`d rather we evolved that way. A new parliament is so expensive. Of course we are stuck here with Labour relying on Scottish seats in particular. Thisd could also crack the mould of english politics . I foresee a new left coalition and PR in some form. In fact we may not get at all what wer think we might followoing the withdrawal of such a large part of the Labour core vote
When you have a moment , N, you might expand on 'we may not get at all what we think we might following the withdrawal of such a large part of the Labour core vote'.
You are right that PR is on its way, but can you bear to think about all its different manifestations and the pros and cons of each?
There must be a clearer-minded person than me out there who can set it out. Please?
We have PR in New Zealand. LOL. Not.
I `ve got it , by George I think I’ve got it !What did I happen to see in “ After Blair “ this morning but a section dealing with the 1867 Reform Act and the Working class vote for the Conservative Party that actually appeared in 1874. Disraeli , remarked the Times , saw the Conservative in the Working man as Michelangelo saw the “ Angel in the marble”
Now HG I know you assume that everyone has a deeply rooted familiarity with all things from here to Hesiod but I have always like Disraeli as a character and I think this reference is a bit obscure in that I had no knowledge of it . I am also quite surprised in that the social Conservatism of the proletariat would be more my cup of tea than yours although I can see elements of the romantic “ Young England “ Conservative in you . Perhaps that’s why I like you !
I trust there is prize …A night out with HG ?
Second prize …….two nights out with HG .....bom tssk
It’s a nice metaphor isn’t it I remember dutifully reading “ The Agony and The Ecstasy “ in Florence and waiting to see David . Any way enough “talking of Michelangelo “ The last time I used an Angel reference was……..” People who echo Margaret Thatcher ,”every Conservative should be a unionist in their bones” are like Angels beating their wings in a vacuum , to misquote Arnold”…and we are back to the English Parliament .
On PR you have caught me out pretending to be clever . I `m mystified really . If the two Party FPTP system breaks down the general expectation would be a fragmentation and the removal of ones ability to directly hold a failing Government to account. Personally I loathe the prospect. It is for this reason I am desperate that Brown does not scrape home this time . We can imagine on what basis he will form the voting system . There are plenty of options to choose from providing endless cover for cynical gerrymandering.
Any number of permutations might be possible but I was thinking that Brown`s supposition that the Liberal party would be content to form part of a Left coalition may not be well founded if the Conservative Party loses its right wing to UKIP leaving a Liberal Conservative Party. Many Liberal voters are deeply suspicious of the centralising Brownite tendency . Similarly the Blair wing of the labour Party no longer has anything in common whatsoever with the Socialist rump. I wonder if a Centre marginally right grouping would emerge .
If so I would not be deserately unhappy in an immediate sense but I have other objections to PR to do with an English style of transparency and the roots of Parliament as a Court based on opposing views which I value.No such considerations will weigh with the barbarian pict Brown though
I am the daughter and grandaughter and probably great grandaughter of Conservative trades unionists N.
Not the white collar, clerk of various sorts and levels modern kind, but the real thing - the highly skilled, craft- and tradesman. Caleb Garth would have been too, a lttle later.
This whole, essential, social grouping disappeared almost completely after the second War as R.A. Butler's monumental change to the education system transformed a generation; our brothers went off to the provincial (whisper it)grammar schools and direct grants; girls had a harder time but the brightest did too. And then it was university, (made even more accessible after Robbins) and professional training, and middle classhood.
'Differentials' was a hot topic at tea, as well as distaste at 'communist' infiltration of the union.
Robert McKenzie wrote of the Angels and their demise; it's still in print.
The Labour auodidact workingman but thoughtful with it, by the way, is a very different creature from an Angel.
A lot of Angels emigrated to Australia and New Zealand too.
I think I will have a look for the book HG , how interesting.
(deconstructed swastika ...ha ha ha funny lady)
hatifled girl,
Perhaps you might consider joining the Witanagemot clob of bloggers?
www.toque.co.uk/witan or search google.
JJ, thank you. I'm not a good joiner but if you care to cut and paste anything here that's serves, do so.
Post a Comment